RSS

Monthly Archives: February 2010

World Leaders Meet, One Mission in Mind: Abolish the Death Penalty

Participants at the Fourth World Congress Against Death Penalty at the European headquarters of the United Nations in Geneva February 24, 2010. Photo: REUTERS/Denis Balibouse

For 200 years now the international movement for the universal abolition of the death penalty has been spearheaded by Italy. With the start of the congress, Laura Mirachian, Italian Ambassador to the United Nations, underlined the special role of her country in the fight against the death penalty. “We have a long tradition of rejecting the death penalty. This is deeply rooted in our culture,” she told Deutsche Welle. “It goes back as far as the 18th century. Tuscany was the first state to abolish the death penalty in 1786 during the war.”

Declaration of Human Rights laid groundwork

However, it took the modern Italy until 1948 to actually abolish it. In the same year, the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” adopted by the UN General Assembly laid the legal groundwork for the fight against the death penalty. Although the abolition is not explicitly mentioned, Article 3 guarantees the right to life free from inhumane or humiliating punishment.

Yet, in the first 20 years of the declaration, only the newly founded Federal Republic of Germany rejected the death penalty in 1949. Not until the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights in 1966 did the UN ask its member states to abolish the death penalty or at least restrict it to very serious crimes. See Second Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

“Dramatic shift since 1980″

This was a first, albeit only a perfunctionary breakthrough. Until then the death penalty was the unchallenged international norm, says Mario Morazzitti, speaker of the Italian religious group Sankt Egidio. “Until the 1970s only 23 nations abolished the death penalty.” But since 1980 Morazzitti identifies among the 192 member states a clear trend away from the death penalty. “During the last 30 years, there has been a dramatic shift. Europe became the first continent in the world where there was no death penalty.”

Driven by Italy, the European states wanted to extend the ban to the rest of the world: First through the UN Commission on Human Rights in Geneva and then the General Assembly in New York. The European efforts failed however, when not only the US and China but also many former European colonies in Africa and Asia refused to accept their anti-death-penalty resolution in 1998. “This was due to a strong opposition, who saw the resolution as a neo-colonial interpretation of human rights interfering in the states’ internal affairs,” says Morazzitti.

56 states and territories hold on to death penalty

For the first time in 2007, the UN General Assembly adopted a Resolution 62/149 demanding the abolition of the death penalty. The resolution states clearly that the imposition and execution of the death penalty is not part of the internal affairs of a particular state and its law but a question of universal human rights.

Over 140 states have in the meantime stopped imposing the death penalty. The majority of them have abolished it by law for all crimes without exception not only in times of peace but also during war. However, 56 states and territories still hold on to the death penalty. Last year, China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, North Korea and the US carried out the most death penalties in the world.

Hope for new UN resolution later this year

Activists at the Fourth World Congress Against the Death Penalty in Geneva hope to achieve a moratorium on the imposition and execution of the death penalty in those 56 states and territories and push them further toward complete abolition. This goal is to be reinforced by a new resolution in the General Assembly later this year. Activists hope that this time the majority for the resolution will be bigger than in 2007 and that the US and China will not vote against it but abstain from their vote.

Over 1,700 participants, including national political leaders, activists and representatives of international organizations, have gathered in Geneva for the three-day Congress.

Sources: Deutsche Welle, International Federation for Human Rights, United Nations

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Cuban Dissident Orlando Zapata Tamayo Dies

Cuban political prisoner Orlando Zapata Tamayo was imprisoned in 2003 for disrespecting authority, disorderly conduct and other political crimes.

Orlando Zapata Tamayo, a Cuban political dissent imprisoned for disrespecting authority, died after a lengthy hunger strike at a clinic at Havana’s Combinado del Este prison.

Zapata Tamayo, 42, was arrested along with 74 others in 2003 for contempt and disrespect of authority. The year of his arrest, Amnesty International called him “prisoner of conscience.” He was originally sentenced to three years, said Elizardo Sanchez, head of the Havana-based Cuban Commission on Human Rights and National Reconciliation. His sentenced was extended to 25 years, primarily because he continued to speak out against Fidel Castro while in prison. Zapata Tamayo went on a hunger strike on December 3, 2009 after accusing the prison guards of repeatedly beating him. He refused to wear a prison uniform, demanded a separate cell from the common prisoners and requested that his family be allowed to bring him food. His hunger strike lasted eleven weeks.

His family told reporters and human rights groups last week that the prison doctors said he was gravely ill. Word of Mr Zapata Tamayo’s death was first reported on Cuban exile radio stations in southern Florida, which broadcast an interview with his mother, Reina Luisa Tamayo.”The death of my son has been a premeditated murder,” Reina Luisa told the newspaper in a telephone interview.  News of his death drew a strong reaction among South Florida leaders who evoked messages of sympathy for his family.

“It is sad to note that this tragic death of Zapata Tamayo at the hands of the brutal Castro regime comes on the day before another anniversary of four other victims of the Castro dictatorship, the unarmed pilots of Brothers to the Rescue,” said Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen said in a statement. “I offer my heartfelt condolences to Zapata Tamayo’s mother, his family and fellow prisoners of conscience. His life and sacrifice will never be forgotten. Let us take his sad and untimely death and renew our commitment to assure that the Cuba of the future is rid of the failed ideology which killed this brave man.”

Rep. Kendrick Meek, a Democrat who represents the 17th Congressional District, issued the following statement: “My thoughts and prayers are with Orlando’s mother, Reina Luisa Tamayo, and his family at this most difficult time. The Cuban government’s stunning lack of respect for human rights was highlighted by Orlando as much in his life as in his death. He stood for freedom in the face of indignity and joins those who have put their lives on the line for the reality of a free Cuba. His stand was an act of conviction – a call for freedom in the face of oppression.”

Rep. Lincoln Diaz-Balart, a Republican who represents the 21st Congressional District, offered his sympathies to his family. “Like Pedro Luis Boitel, the martyrdom of Orlando Zapata Tamayo is now part of Cuba’s most glorious history. His murder by the tyrant Fidel Castro and his cowardly jailers will never be forgotten, nor will it be subject to any future statutes of limitations,” Diaz-Balart wrote. “Orlando Zapata Tamayo’s sacrifice will not be in vain, and he will be forever remembered with infinite honor by the Cuban Republic.”

U.S. Democrat Sen. Bill Nelson, of Florida, said in his own statement that ”freedom-loving people everywhere should hold the Cuban regime responsible for the fate of Orlando Zapata Tamayo.”

The last time an opponent of the communist government died in Cuba during a hunger strike was 1972 with poet and activist Pedro Luis Boitel.

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Record Number of Journalists Jailed, Killed in 2009

UNITED NATIONS, NY — An international press freedom watchdog said that 2009 saw a record number of journalists jailed or killed, including the single worst massacre in the Philippines, as well as an increase in journalists jailed, fueled by the crackdown in Iran.


The New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists said the massacre of 29 journalists and two media support workers in a politically motivated ambush in the southern Philippines on Nov. 23 claimed more lives than any single event since it started documenting attacks on the press 18 years ago.

In its annual report on freedom of the press released Tuesday, the committee also accused Iran of being one of the leading jailers of journalists last year, with more than 90 reporters arrested and at least 23 writers and editors still being held. That’s second only to China, where 24 journalists are in jail today, it said, though that’s a decline from a high of 42 in 2004.

Maziar Bahari, a writer for Newsweek, spent 118 days in an Iranian prison after the disputed presidential election last year. Photo: Fred Chartrand/Associated Press

“The tragedies of 2009 only make our challenge more clear,” the committee’s executive director Joel Simon said in the report’s introduction. “Creating vibrant and secure global media requires new strategic thinking to bring killers to justice, to reduce the number of journalists in jail, and to support reporters working in exile or in repressive environments.”

He said there has been progress, and strongly endorsed the “naming and shaming” of violators which has generated public attention and mobilized action to protect journalists.

The report names 70 journalists killed because of their reporting – including 32 in the Philippines, nine in Somalia, four in Iraq, four in Pakistan and three in Russia. It said 24 other journalists were killed but the motive couldn’t be confirmed, including six in Mexico and three in Pakistan.

Consistent with an overall drop in violence, the number of Iraqi media deaths fell sharply to just four from 32 in 2007 and 11 in 2008, but the committee complained of increasing government harassment and assaults on the media, even in the relatively secure Kurdish region.

Newsweek International’s Editor Fareed Zakaria said in the preface that the closure of many foreign bureaus and reliance on freelancers abroad means that these stringers are taking on added risks.

Sources: Huffington Post, Google AP News

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

Three Malaysian Women Caned for Adultery

The caning case rekindles a debate over rising Islamization in the multi-racial country. Photo: EPA

Three women were caned on February 9, pursuant to Islamic law for committing adultery, a Malaysian minister has said. They are the first women to receive such a sentence under Islamic law in the country. Hishamuddin Tun Hussein, the Malaysian home affairs minister, said the sentences were carried out after Sharia court found them guilty of adultery. Although it is unclear what evidence or information was permitted to reach the verdict, Hishamuddin claims the punishment was “carried out perfectly” and that no woman was injured.

Two of the women were struck six times while the third received four strokes. One woman was released from prison on February 14. Another will be freed in the next few days; the third woman will be released in June 2010.

The Case of Kartika Sari Dewa Shukarno

Meanwhile the older case of Kartika Sari Dewa Shukarno, sentenced to six strokes of a rattan cane for drinking beer, is under review following widespread publicity and international criticism. The case, when first reported, raised concerns that the nation might be moving away from secularization and thus eroding the rights of some 40-45 percent of the country’s ethnic minorities.

Kartika's sentence came under review following widespread criticism. Photo: AFP

Hishammuddin  acknowledges the widespread concerns about caning women (or anyone else) but claims the recent canings demonstrate that the prisons department can carry out punishments in accordance with Islamic law. Under the sharia, women have to be whipped in a seated position by a female prison guard and be fully clothed.

“The punishment is to teach and give a chance to those who have fallen off the path to return and build a better life in future,” Hishammuddin said.

London-based Amnesty International urged Malaysia to end a caning “epidemic”, saying the women’s case was “just the tip of the iceberg”. Donna Guest, the group’s deputy Asia-Pacific director, said in a statement that Malaysian authorities caned more than 35,000 mostly foreigners since 2002. “The government needs to abolish this cruel and degrading punishment, no matter what the offense,” she said.

Sisters in Islam, a local group of Muslim women activists, said the caning “constitutes further discrimination against Muslim women in Malaysia”.

The recent caning cases also raise an important question of law: Whether a religious state court can impose a caning sentence when federal law precludes women from such a punishment, while men below 50 can be punished by caning. Malaysia has a dual-track legal system with Islamic criminal and family laws, which are applicable only to Muslims, running alongside civil laws. Human rights’ advocates contend the current legal inconsistencies can be resolved by simply abolishing the practice of caning.

Sources: BBC, Al Jazeera


 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Dear Mr. President. . .

Dear President Barack Obama:

You have the unique and absolute power as President of the United States to commute the sentence of any federal prisoner. I urge you to use your power to send Hamedah Hasan home to join her three daughters and two grandchildren. She is serving her 17th year of a 27-year prison sentence for a first time, non-violent crack cocaine offense. Were Hamedah convicted of the exact same crime involving the powder form of the drug, she would be home by now.

“The disparity between sentencing crack and powder-based cocaine is wrong and should be completely eliminated.” These were your words in your “Blueprint for Change.” Even if Congress succeeds in its active legislative attempts to reform the sentencing laws that created this shameful and discriminatory disparity, Hamedah Hasan’s prison term will remain. None of the legislation contemplated on Capitol Hill will apply retroactively to those serving excessively harsh crack cocaine sentences. You – and you alone – can reunite Hamedah with her family by commuting her sentence and saving her from another decade in prison.

Hamedah Hasan knitting in prison. Photo: Handout

Were you to commute Hamedah’s sentence, you would join a long line of presidents who have robustly exercised their executive clemency power. Thomas Jefferson employed the pardon power to eliminate the sentences of those convicted under the shameful Alien and Sedition Acts. President John F. Kennedy granted over 100 commutations in less than three years in office. President Lyndon Johnson commuted 226 sentences. The time has come for you too, President Obama, to exercise your power of forgiveness on behalf of an exceptionally worthy person with much to contribute to the community to which she will return.

Even Hamedah’s sentencing judge, the Honorable Richard G. Kopf of the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska, has asked the President to commute Hamedah’s sentence. In a letter supporting her commutation petition, he says:

…I can say, without equivocation, that Ms. Hasan is deserving of the President’s mercy. I have never supported such a request in the past, and I doubt that I will support another one in the future. That said, in this unique case, justice truly cries out for relief.

Only you, President Obama, through the power of commutation, can stop Hamedah’s harsh sentence from running its long course. Doing so would not only help Hamedah and her family, it would provide much needed force to your administration’s statements opposing the crack-powder cocaine sentencing disparity, as well as revive the executive clemency process to its noble and necessary function.

Respectfully Submitted,

Stephanie Williams, J.D.

—————————————————————————————————————————————————–

Resources & Information:

How You Can Help

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on February 15, 2010 in Abuse, Current events, Human Rights, News

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Nigerian Police Extrajudicial Killings Caught on Video

Nigerian police and military units carried out extra-judicial killings last year in the aftermath of clashes with members of a Muslim group in the north of the country, footage obtained by Al Jazeera appears to confirm.

An estimated 1,000 people were killed as Nigerian government forces fought Boko Haram in Borno, Yobe, Kano and Bauchi states in July and August of 2009. But the footage obtained by Al Jazeera shows that many of the deaths occurred only after the fighting was over. Elements of the security forces staged a follow-up operation in which house-to-house searches were conducted and individuals were apparently selected at random and taken to a police station.

“Shoot Him in the Chest”

In the video, a number of unarmed men are seen being made to lie down in the road outside a building before they are shot. As one man is brought out to face death, one of the officers can be heard urging his colleague to “shoot him in the chest not the head – I want his hat”. As the executions continue another man is told: “Sit properly we want to take your picture.” The shootings continue as a crowd gathers further up the street in front of the police station. Voices can be heard saying: “No mercy, no mercy.”

Baba Fugu Mohammed's family says he was among those killed. Photo: AP/ Al Jazeera

Two officers seen in the video can be clearly identified by the name tags on their chests. The family of Baba Fugu Mohammed, a respected community leader, told Al Jazeera that he was among those put to death outside the police station. “He was killed, he was killed, that’s what we believe. He was shot by the police,” one relative said.
Fugu Mohammed was the father-in-law of Mohammed Yusuf, the Boko Haram leader whose group had battled the police, but the two had become estranged. His family said that he had come to help police restore order, but was shot.

Killings of Innocents
In the days following the clashes between the police and Boko Haram, the government, police and military repeatedly denied that civilians had been killed by their personnel. But Nigerian officials have since acknowledged that extra-judicial killings took place and an inquiry was set up to investigate the incident. “It was obvious [from] what we have seen and from the eye witnesses that the government police were doing the killings of the innocent,” Abubakar Umar Garda, a senator and a member of Nigeria’s ruling People’s Democratic party, told Al Jazeera.

“The government is investigating the incident and as we go along the perpetrators will be put in front of the law and the law will take its course … the government acknowledged that this was a crime against humanity … you cannot shoot an unarmed civilian.” Fugu Mohammed’s family have given their story to the government commission set up to investigate the events that took place, but they are still waiting to receive an official explanation for the deaths. Senator Umar Garda could not confirm to Al Jazeera whether there had been any arrests relating to the killings and there have been few tangible signs of the inquiry bringing anyone to account.

Boko Haram Leader Killed
Aster Van Kregten, a Nigeria expert with rights group Amnesty International, told Al Jazeera that the group’s research suggested extra-judicial killings were widespread in Nigeria.

“Our research shows that the Nigerian police are getting away with murder, they killed hundreds of people a year without any investigation – any investigation on whether the use of force was lawful or not,” she said. “What we saw on the footage happened seven month ago and we haven’t heard anything from the government whether they have arrested anyone and how far the investigation is going.” Among those killed in the aftermath of the clashes between Boko Haram and the police, was Boko Haram leader Mohammed Yusuf.

In the Al Jazeera footage, he is seen wearing handcuffs and surrounded by heavily armed police officers. Nigerian police have said that Yusuf was killed while attempting to escape, but he died still wearing the handcuffs.

In another video, which was made available shortly after last year’s fighting, Yusuf is shown inside the police station, his body covered with marks and bruises, as he is questioned about the organisation that he led. It is not known whether the injuries were caused during the fighting, arrest, or detention.

Extra-judicial Killings
The New York-based Human Rights Watch described Yusuf’s death as “an extra-judicial killing”. “The extra-judicial killing of Mr Yusuf in police custody is a shocking example of the brazen contempt by the Nigerian police for the rule of law,” Eric Guttschuss, the organisation’s Nigeria researcher, said.

Boko Haram, which means “Western education is prohibited” in the local Hausa dialect, has called for the nationwide enforcement of a strict interpretation of Islamic law, or sharia, even among non-Muslims. Last year’s clashes took place after suspected Boko Haram members, armed with machetes, knives, bows and arrows, and home-made explosives, attacked police buildings and officers.

Nigeria’s 150 million people are nearly evenly divided between Christians, who dominate the south, and the primarily northern-based Muslims. Islamic law was implemented in 12 northern states after Nigeria returned to civilian rule in 1999 following years of military rule.

Source: Al Jazeera

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Presidential Proclamation – National Slavery and Human Trafficking Prevention Month

A PROCLAMATION

The United States was founded on the principle that all people are born with an unalienable right to freedom — an ideal that has driven the engine of American progress throughout our history. As a Nation, we have known moments of great darkness and greater light; and dim years of chattel slavery illuminated and brought to an end by President Lincoln’s actions and a painful Civil War. Yet even today, the darkness and inhumanity of enslavement exists. Millions of people worldwide are held in compelled service, as well as thousands within the United States. During National Slavery and Human Trafficking Prevention Month, we acknowledge that forms of slavery still exist in the modern era, and we recommit ourselves to stopping the human traffickers who ply this horrific trade.

As we continue our fight to deliver on the promise of freedom, we commemorate the Emancipation Proclamation, which became effective on January 1, 1863, and the 13th Amendment, which was sent to the States for ratification on February 1, 1865. Throughout the month of January, we highlight the many fronts in the ongoing battle for civil rights — including the efforts of our Federal agencies; State, local, and tribal law enforcement partners; international partners; nonprofit social service providers; private industry and nongovernmental organizations around the world who are working to end human trafficking.

The victims of modern slavery have many faces. They are men and women, adults and children. Yet, all are denied basic human dignity and freedom. Victims can be abused in their own countries, or find themselves far from home and vulnerable. Whether they are trapped in forced sexual or labor exploitation, human trafficking victims cannot walk away, but are held in service through force, threats, and fear. All too often suffering from horrible physical and sexual abuse, it is hard for them to imagine that there might be a place of refuge.

We must join together as a Nation and global community to provide that safe haven by protecting victims and prosecuting traffickers. With improved victim identification, medical and social services, training for first responders, and increased public awareness, the men, women, and children who have suffered this scourge can overcome the bonds of modern slavery, receive protection and justice, and successfully reclaim their rightful independence.

Fighting modern slavery and human trafficking is a shared responsibility. This month, I urge all Americans to educate themselves about all forms of modern slavery and the signs and consequences of human trafficking. Together, we can and must end this most serious, ongoing criminal civil rights violation.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim January 2010 as National Slavery and Human Trafficking Prevention Month, culminating in the annual celebration of National Freedom Day on February 1. I call upon the people of the United States to recognize the vital role we can play in ending modern slavery, and to observe this month with appropriate programs and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourth day of January, in the year of our Lord two thousand ten, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fourth.

BARACK OBAMA

Read the rest of this entry »

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

U.S. Department of State: Trafficking in Persons Report 2009

Summary: Trafficking in Persons Report (TIP) 2009

Office To Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons

The United States’ Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (TVPA), as amended, guides efforts to combat human trafficking. The most recent amendments to the TVPA were enacted in December 2008. The purpose of the law is to punish traffickers, protect victims, and prevent trafficking from occurring. Freeing victims from this form of modern-day slavery is the ultimate goal of this report—and of the U.S. Government’s anti-human trafficking policy.

Human trafficking is a multi-dimensional issue. It is a crime that deprives people of their human rights and freedoms, increases global health risks, fuels growing networks of organized crime, and can sustain levels of poverty and impede development in certain areas.

The impacts of human trafficking are devastating. Victims may suffer physical and emotional abuse, rape, threats against self and family, and even death. But the devastation also extends beyond individual victims; human trafficking undermines the health, safety, and security of all nations it touches.

A growing community of nations is making significant efforts to eliminate this atrocious crime. The TVPA outlines minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking in persons. Countries that do not make significant efforts to comply with the minimum standards receive a Tier 3 ranking in this report. Such an assessment could prompt the United States to withhold non-humanitarian, non-trade-related foreign assistance.

In assessing foreign governments’ efforts, the TIP Report highlights the “three P’s”— prosecution, protection, and prevention. But a victim-centered approach to trafficking also requires attention to the “three R’s”—rescue, rehabilitation, and reintegration. Sharing the best practices in these areas will encourage governments to go beyond the initial rescue of victims and restore to them dignity and the hope of productive lives.

Human Trafficking Defined

The TVPA defines “severe forms of trafficking” as:

a. sex trafficking in which a commercial sex act is induced by force, fraud, or coercion, or in which the person induced to perform such an act has not attained 18 years of age; or

b. the recruitment, harboring, transportation, provision, or obtaining of a person for labor or services, through the use of force, fraud, or coercion for the purpose of subjection to involuntary servitude, peonage, debt bondage, or slavery.

A victim need not be physically transported from one location to another in order for the crime to fall within these definitions.

The Scope and Nature of Modern-Day Slavery

The common denominator of trafficking scenarios is the use of force, fraud, or coercion to exploit a person for profit. Traffickers can subject victims to labor exploitation, sexual exploitation, or both. Trafficking for labor exploitation, the form of trafficking claiming the greatest number of victims, includes traditional chattel slavery, forced labor, and debt bondage. Trafficking for sexual exploitation typically includes abuse within the commercial sex industry. In other cases, individuals exploit victims in private homes, often demanding both sex and work. The use of force or coercion can be direct and violent or psychological.

A wide range of estimates exists on the scope and magnitude of modern-day slavery. The International Labor Organization (ILO)—the United Nations agency charged with addressing labor standards, employment, and social protection issues—estimates that there are at least 12.3 million adults and children in forced labor, bonded labor, and commercial sexual servitude at any given time.

Of these victims, the ILO estimates that at least 1.39 million are victims of commercial sexual servitude, both transnational and within countries. According to the ILO, 56 percent of all forced labor victims are women and girls. Human traffickers prey on the weak. Targeting vulnerable men, women, and children, they use creative and ruthless ploys designed to trick, coerce, and win the confidence of potential victims. Very often these ruses involve promises of a better life through employment, educational opportunities, or marriage.

The nationalities of trafficked people are as diverse as the world’s cultures. Some leave developing countries, seeking to improve their lives through low-skilled jobs in more prosperous countries. Others fall victim to forced or bonded labor in their own countries. Women, eager for a better future, are susceptible to promises of jobs abroad as babysitters, housekeepers, waitresses, or models—jobs that traffickers turn into the nightmare of forced prostitution without exit. Some families give children to adults, often relatives, who promise education and opportunity but instead sell the children into exploitative situations for money. But poverty alone does not explain this tragedy, which is driven by fraudulent recruiters, employers, and corrupt officials who seek to reap profits from others’ desperation.

Source: U.S. Department of State

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

Major Forms of Trafficking in Persons

Forced Labor

The majority of human trafficking in the world takes the form of forced labor, according to the ILO’s estimate on forced labor. Also known as involuntary servitude, forced labor may result when unscrupulous employers take advantage of gaps in law enforcement to exploit vulnerable workers. These workers are made more vulnerable to forced labor practices because of high rates of unemployment, poverty, crime, discrimination, corruption, political conflict, and cultural acceptance of the practice. Immigrants are particularly vulnerable, but individuals are also forced into labor in their own countries. Female victims of forced or bonded labor, especially women and girls in domestic servitude, are often sexually exploited as well.

Forced labor is a form of human trafficking that is often harder to identify and estimate than sex trafficking. It may not involve the same criminal networks profiting from transnational sex trafficking. Instead, it may involve individuals who subject workers to involuntary servitude, perhaps through forced or coerced household or factory work.

Bonded Labor

One form of force or coercion is the use of a bond, or debt, to keep a person under subjugation. This is referred to in law and policy as “bonded labor” or “debt bondage.” U.S. law prohibits debt bondage, and the UN TIP Protocol includes it as a form of traffickingrelated exploitation. Workers around the world fall victim to debt bondage when traffickers or recruiters unlawfully exploit an initial debt the worker assumed as part of the terms of employment.

Workers may also inherit debt in more traditional systems of bonded labor. Traditional bonded labor in South Asia, for example, enslaves huge numbers of people from generation to generation. A January 2009 report by Anti-Slavery International, a London-based NGO, concluded that this form of forced labor, traditionally more prevalent in villages, is expanding into urban areas of the region, rather than diminishing on an aggregate level, as the result of development and modernization.

Photo: Prashant Ravi/AP

Debt Bondage Among Migrant Laborers

The vulnerability of migrant laborers to trafficking schemes is especially disturbing because the population is sizeable in some regions. There are three potential contributing factors: (1) abuse of contracts; (2) inadequate local laws governing the recruitment and employment of migrant laborers; and (3) intentional imposition of exploitative and often illegal costs and debts on these laborers in the source country, often with the support of labor agencies and employers in the destination country.

Abuses of contracts and hazardous conditions of employment do not in themselves constitute involuntary servitude. But the use or threat of physical force or restraint to keep a person working may convert a situation into one of forced labor. Costs imposed on laborers for the “privilege” of working abroad can make laborers vulnerable to debt bondage. While the costs alone do not constitute debt bondage, when they become excessive and involve exploitation by unscrupulous employers in the destination country, they can lead to involuntary servitude.

Involuntary Domestic Servitude

A unique form of forced labor is that of involuntary domestic workers, whose workplace is informal, connected to their off-duty living quarters, and not often shared with other workers. Such an environment is conducive to exploitation since authorities cannot inspect private property as easily as they can inspect formal workplaces. In some countries, large numbers of local children, often from less developed rural areas of the country, labor in urban households as domestic servants. Some of them may be vulnerable to conditions of involuntary servitude.

Foreign migrants, usually women, are recruited from less developed countries in South Asia, Southeast Asia, Africa, and Latin America to work as domestic servants and caretakers in more developed locations like the Gulf States, the Levant, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, Europe, and the United States. But many of these places do not provide domestic servants the same legal protections that they provide for foreign workers in other sectors.

Without protections, foreign domestic workers may have fewer options for seeking help when faced with their employer’s threat of or use of force. If they are confined to a home, either through physical restraint or through the confiscation of identity and travel documents, they may find it very difficult to reach out to NGOs or public authorities for assistance due to lack of awareness and fear of their employers.

This high degree of vulnerability calls for a vigorous law enforcement and victim protection response when domestic servants are found in conditions of involuntary servitude in a home. Those domestic servants who choose to escape from abusive employers are sometimes termed “runaways” and seen as criminals, though they should be considered as possible victims of trafficking.

Forced Child Labor

Most international organizations and national laws recognize that children may legally engage in light work. There is a growing concensus, however, that the worst forms of child labor should be eradicated. The sale and trafficking of children and their entrapment in bonded and forced labor are among the worst forms of child labor. Any child who is subject to involuntary servitude, debt bondage, peonage, or slavery through the use of force, fraud, or coercion, is a victim of human trafficking regardless of the location of that exploitation. Indicators of possible forced labor of a child include situations in which the child appears to be in the custody of a non-family member who has the child perform work that financially benefits someone outside the child’s family and does not offer the child the option of leaving.

Child Soldiers

Child soldiering is a unique and severe manifestation of trafficking in persons that involves the unlawful recruitment of children— often through force, fraud, or coercion—for labor or sexual exploitation in conflict areas. Perpetrators may be government forces, paramilitary organizations, or rebel groups. While the majority of child soldiers are between the ages of 15 and 18, some of whom may have been unlawfully recruited and used in hostilities, others are as young as 7 or 8, which is unlawful under international law.

Although it is impossible to accurately calculate the number of children involved in armed forces and groups, the Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers estimates that there are many tens of thousands of children exploited in conflict. Child soldiers exist in all regions of the world. According to the UN, 57 armed groups and forces were using children in 2007, up from 40 in 2006.

Many children are abducted to be used as combatants. Others are made unlawfully to work as porters, cooks, guards, servants, messengers, or spies. Young girls are forced to marry or have sex with male combatants. Both male and female child soldiers are often sexually abused and are at high risk of contracting sexually transmitted diseases.

Some children have been forced to commit atrocities against their families and communities. Child soldiers are often killed or wounded, and survivors suffer multiple traumas and psychological scarring. Their personal development is irreparably damaged, and their home communities often reject them when they return.

Child soldiering is a global phenomenon. The problem is most critical in Africa and Asia, but armed groups in conflict areas elsewhere also use children unlawfully. All nations must work together with international organizations and NGOs to take urgent action to disarm, demobilize, and reintegrate unlawful child soldiers.

Sex Trafficking

Sex trafficking comprises a significant portion of overall human trafficking. When a person is coerced, forced, or deceived into prostitution, or maintained in prostitution through coercion, that person is a victim of trafficking. All of those involved in recruiting, transporting, harboring, receiving, or obtaining the person for that purpose have committed a trafficking crime. Sex trafficking can also occur alongside debt bondage, as women and girls are forced to continue in prostitution through the use of unlawful “debt” purportedly incurred through their transportation or recruitment—or their crude “sale”—which exploiters insist they must pay off before they can be free.

Child Sex Trafficking and Related Abuses

Analysis of child trafficking often leads to the consideration of other categories of child exploitation. The following guide attempts to clarify what is addressed in the TIP Report:

Child Sex Trafficking: According to UNICEF, as many as two million children are subjected to prostitution in the global commercial sex trade. International covenants and protocols obligate criminalization of the commercial sexual exploitation of children. The use of children in the commercial sex trade is prohibited under both U.S. law and the UN TIP Protocol. There can be no exceptions and no cultural or socioeconomic rationalizations that prevent the rescue of children from sexual servitude. Sex trafficking has devastating consequences for minors, including long-lasting physical and psychological trauma, disease (including HIV/ AIDS), drug addiction, unwanted pregnancy, malnutrition, social ostracism, and possible death.

Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children (CSEC) is the sexual exploitation of children for the commercial gain of some person(s). CSEC includes all child prostitution as well as child pornography. This is not human trafficking per se, as some forms of CSEC such as child pornography are not always a form of human trafficking. Most forms of CSEC, however, are forms of human trafficking, such as child sex trafficking.

Child Sex Tourism (CST) is one form of “demand” for victims of child sex trafficking. It involves people who travel from their own country—often a country where child sexual exploitation is illegal or culturally abhorrent— to another country where they engage in commercial sex acts with children. CST is a shameful assault on the dignity of children and a form of violent child abuse. It often involves trafficking, as a trafficking crime likely was committed in the provision of the child for the sex tourist’s exploitation.

Addressing Child Sex Tourism in the TIP Report: Efforts by a government to prevent its nationals from traveling abroad to engage in child sex tourism—including by prosecuting alleged child sex tourists for conduct they committed overseas—is cited in that country’s narrative under the Prevention section. Likewise, efforts by a “destination” government to punish foreign nationals for alleged child sex tourism offenses are cited in the Prevention section of that country’s narrative as an effort to “reduce demand for commercial sex acts” in general. Efforts by the same destination government to punish the trafficking of children for commercial sexual exploitation by any persons – foreign sex tourist or local resident – are credited in the Prosecution section of that country’s narrative.

Source: U.S. Department of State

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Trafficking in Persons Report 2009: Tier Placement

Tier Placement

The Department places each country in the 2009 TIP Report onto one of the three tier lists as mandated by the TVPA. This placement is based more on the extent of government action to combat trafficking than on the size of the problem, although that is also an important factor. The Department first evaluates whether the government fully complies with the TVPA’s minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking. Governments that fully comply are placed on Tier 1. For other governments, the Department considers the extent of efforts to reach compliance.

Governments that are making significant efforts to meet the minimum standards are placed on Tier 2. Governments that do not fully comply with the minimum standards and are not making significant efforts to do so are placed on Tier 3. Finally, the Department considers the Special Watch List criteria and, when applicable, moves Tier 2 countries to Tier 2 Watch List.

The TVPA lists three factors by which to determine whether a country should be on Tier 2 (or Tier 2 Watch List) versus Tier 3: (1) the extent to which the country is a country of origin, transit, or destination for severe forms of trafficking; (2) the extent to which the country’s government does not comply with the TVPA’s minimum standards including, in particular, the extent to which officials or government employees have been complicit in severe forms of trafficking; and (3) the government’s resources and capabilities to address and eliminate severe forms of trafficking in persons.

Tier 2 Watch List

The TVPA requires that certain countries be placed on a Special Watch List. This includes countries in which:

a. The absolute number of victims of severe forms of trafficking is very significant or is significantly increasing;

b. There is a failure to provide evidence of increasing efforts to combat severe forms of trafficking in persons from the previous year, including increased investigations, prosecutions, and convictions of trafficking crimes; increased assistance to victims; and decreasing evidence of complicity in severe forms of trafficking by government officials; or

c. The determination that a country is making significant efforts to bring itself into compliance with the minimum standards was based on commitments by the country to take additional steps over the next year.

Countries that meet one of these three criteria are placed onto what the Department of State has termed the “Tier 2 Watch List.” There were 40 countries on Tier 2 Watch List in the June 2008 report. Two additional countries were reassessed as Tier 2 Watch List countries in November 2008. The Department of State included these 42 countries in an “Interim Assessment” released on January 27, 2009.

Of these 42 countries on Tier 2 Watch List at the time of the Interim Assessment, 11 moved up to Tier 2 in this report, while four fell to Tier 3 and 27 remain on Tier 2 Watch List. Countries on Tier 2 Watch List in this report will be re-examined in the next Interim Assessment, which will be submitted to the U.S. Congress by February 1, 2010.

Amendments made by the TVPRA of 2008 provide that any country that has been ranked Tier 2 Watch List for two consecutive years (beginning with the 2009 Report) will be ranked Tier 3, unless the President waives application of this provision based on a determination that, among other things, the government has a written plan for meeting the TVPA’s minimum standards.

Penalties for Tier 3 Countries

Pursuant to the TVPA, governments of countries on Tier 3 may be subject to certain sanctions, whereby the U.S. Government may withhold nonhumanitarian, non-trade-related foreign assistance. Countries that receive no such assistance may not receive such assistance and, in addition, may not receive funding for government employees’ participation in educational and cultural exchange programs. Consistent with the TVPA, governments subject to sanctions would also face U.S. opposition to assistance (except for humanitarian, trade-related, and certain development-related assistance) from international financial institutions such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank.

Imposed sanctions will take effect October 1, 2009; however, all or part of the TVPA’s sanctions can be waived if the President determines that the provision of such assistance to the government would promote the purposes of the statute or is otherwise in the national interest of the United States. The TVPA also provides that sanctions can be waived if necessary to avoid significant adverse effects on vulnerable populations, including women and children. Sanctions would not apply if the President finds that, after this report is issued but before sanctions determinations are made, a government has come into compliance with the minimum standards or is making significant efforts to bring itself into compliance.

No tier ranking is permanent. Every country can do more, including the United States, which has a significant human trafficking problem. All countries must maintain and increase efforts to combat trafficking.

Source: U.S. Department of State



 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 52 other followers